CO129-243 - Public Offices & Others - 1889 — Page 377

• Col. Locork.

? by.

Put fud 619

M. Bramste

多

athen $769,8

See Col. Locock's note annexed

the letter with same slighte

my

returning amendments of certain figure He has however misunderstood point; I wished to make sure that.

5,29,30,65871 for

M. Humphreys farden Lots which Mis Surveyor General

to Nov. 19 L

1887 declared and

no

building

h

lease had been issued, were in fact identical with the Inland Lots Nop. 412, 522 853 64which

were issued in 1886.

leases

I don't believe that M. Humphrezi Garden Lots above name dare included in these Inland Lots (though then the patirtys Col. Lec. does say

the growed") july the remainder of

because the A. S. in his reports way. 8°

Plays

that questizie of

very explicit wty W Humphrey,

was still under discussi

in 1887 + so

Cofold not have been the baldag teacher granted

granted in 1886.

Isubmit drafts for

Eu92619

*

Konuy

A

Headley

Jefs. 10/85

374

request

Jan

flak

&tai umel action.

Yours fault fully

Rococh

letter about certaus

4/42

Kowloon, Hong Kong, regained for mublary pupores.

I have bee

leave for the last monthe-

I have been ups

7

Kough

London 3 times to do a

B

lags

at the office, I have

work or so of the

found

gail accenn

much a

" pile of papers waiting for